The Art of Night – The Photography of Mark Gee

The Art of Astrophotography

Photograph The Heavens Above Palliser by Mark Gee on 500px The Heavens Above Palliser by Mark Gee on 500px


A Guide To Shooting the Milky Way


Welcome to the wonderful world of astrophotography. I first began my journey over 5 years ago, when I saw these amazing images of earthly landscapes beneath endless starry skies posted online as part of the Astronomy Photographer of the Year competition. Since then, I have spent many hours under the stars attempting to perfect my skills in one of the most frustrating forms of photography there is…and I don’t think I ever will perfect my skills, as I find myself continually learning every time I go out.

Planning, patience and persistence are the name of the game – believe me, some of my planned shots have taken me over a year to get right. Constant obstacles, from bad weather and bad timing to landslides and equipment failures, all make it a very frustrating pursuit. But in the end, after all the failures, when you finally do nail the shot, it then becomes one of the most rewarding forms of photography there is.

This is a general guide of how I personally go about my astrophotography. There are numerous additional techniques out there, including tracking, stacking and dark frame extraction workflows. Personally, I don’t use any of those techniques so won’t be covering them here, but you’ll find plenty of information about them on the web.

Moon Silhouettes took over a year to get it right – I had so many failed attempts, but in the end the results were highly rewarding!

Types of Astrophotography Photography

There are various types of astrophotography one can pursue.

  • Deep space – images which are taken with use of a telescope of objects beyond our own solar system. These are those stunning images you see of distant galaxies and nebulae, and this is the most technical and hardest form of astrophotography.
  • Solar System - these are images of the planets, moons and the sun of our own solar system. Again the images are mostly photographed through telescopes, but a super telephoto lens on a DSLR cameras can also give you a good result.
  • Wide Field Astrophotography – this is astrophotography that is taken with a DSLR camera and lens with a wide field of view, i.e. wide angled lens. These are the images you see that include a starry sky or star trails above a landscape. This is the most accessible form of astrophotography, and are the kind I practice and will be teaching you about.
  • Time-lapse Astrophotography – is just an extension on Wide Field Astrophotography. The only difference is you take lots of exposures over time and then combine the frames to make a time-lapse video. The same technique can be used to make a star trail image.

Wide Field Astrophotography taken with a DSLR Camera and a wide angled lens marries landscapes and the night sky together.


In the modern age of digital photography, wide field astrophotography is now within almost anyone’s reach. Equipment-wise, all you need is a modern DSLR camera with good low light capabilities, a fast lens and a good sturdy tripod. This will get you out there taking good quality night sky images.

Beyond that you can also add to the kit with additional accessories that will allow you to do a little more, like an intervalometer, which will allow you to do time-lapses and star trails. Of course you can go out and accumulate a whole lot of other specialised equipment, like equatorial mounts which follow rotation of the night sky, and robotic camera mounts for capturing large panoramic images, but for now we’ll concentrate on the basics.

  • DSLR Camera – the modern day Digital Single Lens Reflex Camera can have great low light capabilities, and it’s these cameras that are perfect for astrophotography. Ideally you want a full framed sensor camera like the Canon 5d MkII and MkIII and the Canon 6D, or the Nikon D600, as you need to have the maximum sensor area to capture as much light information as possible. But you can also get reasonable results with crop sensor cameras like the Canon 7d or the Nikon D7100, which may suit your budget a little more than the full framed counterparts.
  • Lenses - when shooting the stars you want a lens with a large aperture to allow as much light as possible through the lens. Ideally a maximum aperture of at least f/2.8 is best, but you could still get good result with a f/4.0 lens. Unfortunately, the larger the aperture the more expensive the lens, but you can get good alternate brand lenses a lot cheaper than the Canon’s and Nikon’s. The good thing about astrophotography is that you only ever use manual focus, so a lens like a Rokinon 14mm Ultra Wide-Angle f/2.8 is a great piece of glass for the right price. As far as focal length is concerned, stay in the ultra wide range. My 14mm lens is my astrophotography workhorse. I occasionally use a longer focal length of 24mm, but that’s usually when I am shooting a multi image pano.
  • Tripod - believe it or not, a tripod is one of the most important pieces of equipment you can have for astrophotography. You need your camera platform to be rock solid as you will mostly be dealing with exposure times of 10-30 seconds, so it’s important to have a sturdy tripod that will keep your camera in place. I use a tripod made for video cameras as they are generally more heavy duty and solid than your everyday photographic camera tripod.
This image was shot with a Gigapan Epic Pro robotic camera mount. It’s made up of 35 individual images which are stitched together, making the final image a 126 megapixel image.

Photographing in Low Level Light

  • Locking it down – with any form of astrophotography, you will be dealing with long exposures. This means for best results you need to eliminate any camera movement or vibration. The obvious way to do this is to mount your camera on a sturdy tripod. But there are other issues which cause movement and vibration when using your camera. The first one is that by simply pressing the shutter button you are possibly causing the camera to move slightly, even when mounted on a sturdy tripod. You probably won’t notice this movement in your wide field astrophotography images, but if you are trying to photograph the moon with a telephoto lens, even the smallest of movements will be amplified and noticeable in your images. The best way to resolve this is to either use a shutter release cable, or set the self timer on the camera to say 2 seconds, so there is a delay from the time you press the shutter button to when the shutter opens and the photo is taken. Another cause of vibration that is present in DSLR cameras is the vibration that the mirror causes as it is rotated up out of the way of the sensor when the shutter button is pressed. Thankfully, most cameras these days have a mirror lock function, so the first press of the shutter button locks the mirror up, and then a second press fires the shutter while the mirror is locked up in place.
  • Find your framing – when you go out to shoot the night sky, you are going to be somewhere quite dark, unless you’re shooting around the city or during a full moon. So framing your shot won’t be as easy as just looking through the viewfinder and lining something up like you do in daylight. The best way to go about this is to use your own eyes to find an area of sky and landscape that you think will make a good composition, and line the camera up in that general direction. You’ll then have to do test shots so you can see on the lcd on the back of the camera what you are actually capturing. It will probably take a few goes of moving the camera around on the tripod to find something interesting that will work for you. Sometimes it takes me up to 30 minutes to set the camera up and get the exact composition I want, so make sure you allow for composition set up time in your planning.
  • Focusing – getting your focus correct is critical in any form of photography. In astrophotography this process is made even harder due to the lack of light to auto focus with. So how do you focus to get sharp images at night time? Well there’s a couple of ways to go about it. In all forms of astrophotography you will always shoot in manual focus mode and be setting your focus to as close to infinity as possible, so your distant landscape and/or night sky will be at hyperfocal distance. This may be as simple as lining the focus ring up to the infinity mark (looks like an “8” on its side) on your lens, but just be aware that on a lot of lenses this may not always be accurate, and you might find your stars are slightly blurry when you’ve downloaded your images on the computer. Some lenses don’t even have an infinity mark, so to be certain of accuracy, one method is to set your infinity focus in the daytime by focusing on a distant object with auto focus. You can then lock your focus down by switching it to manual and taping a piece of gaffer tape across the focus ring so it doesn’t move. This way you will be pre-focused for your night of astrophotography. Even then, it’s always good to check on your test astro shots at 100% zoom on the lcd at the back of the camera, just to be certain your stars are sharp and in focus. I find a loupe very handy for checking this. Another method is using live view on your camera and zooming in as much as you can on the lcd display on the back of your camera. Set your focus manually as close as you can to infinity, and then find the brightest star in the sky and make minor focus adjustments until the star looks sharp. Take a test shot and zoom right in to make sure your stars are sharp. If not, just repeat this process.
Looking up at the Cape Palliser lighthouse with the Milky Way above. I shot this with a 14mm lens set with the focus manually set to infinity. The image has a relatively large depth of field due to the short hyperfocal distance that you get with the 14mm lens.

Planning for Astrophotography

Planning is one of the most important things to do when going out to shoot the night sky. You could go out there and photograph without some kind of planning, but it’s always a good idea to know your locations beforehand, and what you plan to shoot. I always have an idea in my head of what I want to shoot before I go out. I certainly don’t get exactly what I had planned every time I go out. Sometimes I come home with nothing worth looking at, and other times I manage to capture a great image that is totally different to what I planned in the first place.

  • LocationI have a list of favorite locations around my local area that have served me well over the last few years with my astrophotography. I found a lot of these locations by either seeing photos of the location on the internet, or by searching on google maps. I always go to a location I’ve never been to in the daytime first, as it’s almost impossible to scout around a dark location at night.
  • Knowing where the stars arepart of planning for astrophotography is knowing where the part of the sky is you want to shoot, and how that lines up with your planned composition. Our own planet is rotating at 1000 miles per hour and is also hurtling through space at 67,000 miles per hour! So as you can imagine, the night sky is constantly moving, with the position of the stars and The Milky Way constantly changing throughout the year. So it’s important that you know where the Milky Way is going to be in the night sky when you are heading out to photograph it. There are a few apps for your smart phone to help with this planning, and one I have been using now for a while is called Starwalk. It will show you the position of the stars and Milky Way at any given time, allowing you to plan for that perfect Milky Way shot.
  • Shooting for the moonYou may have seen my Full Moon Silhouettes video? Well it was no stroke of luck that I managed to capture the moon rising behind the lookout with the people silhouetted in front of it. In fact, it took a lot of precise planning and over a year of attempts and failures to get it right. So how did I calculate the moon was going to rise right behind the people like that? Well I had some help from another app. Again, there are a couple of apps out there which will help you with this precise planning – one of them is called The Photographer’s Ephemeris (TPE). Or if you have an iphone, I can personally recommend an app called PhotoPills, as it does so much more than just calculating the positioning of the moon. If you are interested, I’ve written a more comprehensive blog of taking you through a real world example of using PhotoPills here.
Another planned pano – I wanted to capture the entire visible Milky Way in this shot and the two Magellanic Clouds. It took over 30 minutes to shoot the 56 images that make up this pano and a lot of work to stitch all those images together!


With all forms of astrophotography you will need to shoot manually on all your settings. This is because the camera will not be able to correctly evaluate the automatic settings with the available light at night time.  Doing this will also give you consistency across your astro shots. I’ll go through these settings below, as well as the factors to consider for each.

  • Exposure – There are two main factors which control your exposure in photography. One of them is the time your shutter is open -shutter speed – and the other is aperture. The combination of these two determines how much light hits your sensor for giving you the final image. In astrophotography, you will be dealing with long exposures as you are photographing objects in the dark.
  • Shutter Speed - is the amount of time your camera shutter is open to allow light onto the sensor. In astrophotography we need a long shutter speed to allow enough light onto the sensor. We also have to consider that the longer you leave the shutter open, the more star trails or streaking of stars you are going to get due to the earth’s rotation. This may be a desired effect if you set out to capture star trails, but generally you want to avoid them in your wide field astro photos, so it’s important to know how long you can expose for before you get star trails. This will vary depending on what focal length lens you use. The longer the focal length, the shorter the exposure time will have to be before getting star trails. Thankfully there is a formula for this called the 600 rule. This rule is simply 600 divided by the true focal length of the lens you are using. And by true focal length, it’s the focal length of the actual lens only if you are using a full frame camera. If you are using a camera that has a smaller sensor, you need to factor the crop factor into the focal length. For example, if you were using the Canon 7d, which has a crop factor of 1.6 with a 10mm lens, then your true focal length would be 10 x 1.6, which is equivalent to a 16mm field of view on a full frame camera. Now since you’ve grasped the crop factor concept, lets go back to our 600 rule. So on a full framed camera, the maximum shutter speed you could use before seeing star trails when using, say, a 24mm lens is: 600 divided by 24mm = 25 second exposure. If you were using that same lens on a smaller sensor with a crop factor of 1.6, your maximum shutter speed would be: 600 divided by (24mm x 1.6) = 15.625 seconds.
  • Apertureis the diaphragm mechanism of your lens which controls how much light gets through to the sensor in the camera by opening and closing. You can think of it as the same way the pupil of your eye works – the pupil gets wider in the dark allowing more light through your eye, but narrower when there is light, to allow in less light. We define aperture as stops, and the setting you will change to control your aperture on your camera are f-numbers. In astrophotography, we need as much light to pass through the lens and hit the sensor as possible, so we generally shoot wide open, or at your lens maximum aperture. The lenses I use have a maximum aperture of f/2.8, so this is the aperture setting I use a majority of the time for my wide field astrophotography. If I’m shooting something a brighter, like the moon, and I want to see some detail on the surface of it, then I will usually stop down (make the aperture smaller to let less light in) to around f/9
  • ISOmodern DSLR cameras are capable of high ISOs, which is great for astrophotography, as by setting a high ISO your camera is able to pick up more detail than the naked eye can see. An ISO in digital photography measures the sensitivity of your image sensor in your camera. The higher the ISO value, the more sensitive or amplified your image sensor is to light. The only downfall is that the higher the ISO, the more noise you get in your image, but this can be rectified to a certain degree with noise reduction in post. And since we are shooting in darkness, we want to be able to shoot at the highest ISO possible without getting too much noise in the image that we will not be able to control with noise reduction. For me on my Canon 5D MkIII, this is between and ISO of 3200 and 6400. For other cameras this may vary, and you mightn’t be able to push your ISO so far, but it’s worth experimenting to see just how far you can push your ISO without too much image degradation.
  • White Balancethis is the process of removing unwanted colour casts and instead  giving you an image with neutral whites. This value will vary under different lighting sources, so that’s why it is important to manually set this value for astrophotography. Some people set the white balance to one of the presets on their camera, like daylight for example, and then deal with neutralising their white balance in post production. This is totally ok when shooting raw. If you are shooting jpegs (not recommended for night time photography) then you need to get your white balance as correct as possible – this will need to be set manually. For astrophotography, this can vary between 3200k to 4800k depending on the lighting conditions. You could also use the tungsten white balance preset as this is approximately 3200k.
  • What Settings do I use? - there are numerous factors for this and will mostly depend on the type of camera and lens you use, and how dark your shooting environment is. As an example, I shoot with a Canon 5d MkIII and a 14mm f/2.8 lens, so in a dark sky environment, my typical settings are a 30 second shutter speed, aperture at f/2.8 and an ISO of 3200. These setting may vary for you when taking into account the environment and equipment you are using to shoot with, and is something you will need to experiment with until you get a result you’re happy with.

 Photographing people against a starry sky can certainly look impressive – the trick is you need your subjects to stand still for at least as long as your exposure – in this case, I was the person who had to sit still for 30 seconds.


With wide field astrophotography, no matter how spectacular the night sky is, marrying the landscape with the sky in an aesthetic way is a must if you want to end up with an image that stands out from others. With the correct settings, anyone can point a camera and take an ok picture of the night sky. But the difference between an ok picture and a great picture is usually composition.

Composition is something that can come naturally to people who have an artistic eye, but others struggle to grasp it and cannot see a good composition even when it’s right in front of them. Thankfully there are simple rules to help those who can’t easily see a good composition, and if you are aware of and plan your shots around these rules, then composition may start to come more naturally to you. Below are just a few of these rules.

  • The Rule of Thirds - it’s a rule based on breaking an image down into thirds, both vertically and horizontally. The idea is that you place your point of interest on one of the intersections of these thirds to give you a pleasing composition.
  • Points of Interest – An image without a point of interest will not hold the viewer’s attention for long. It could be something as simple as a tree in the foreground silhouetted by the night sky, or the Milky Way hanging low over the horizon of mountainous landscape.
  • Make sure your horizon is straight – unless you are deliberately going for a dutch tilt, it’s really important in any landscape photography to make sure your horizon is straight. This same rule applies to wide field astrophotography if there is a horizon in your shot.

Good composition is the key to any kind of photography. This image was shortlisted for the 2012 Astronomy Photographer of the Year due to its pleasing juxtaposition between the foreground tree and The Milky Way.

Digital Processing

This topic can certainly be a tutorial on its own, so I’m not going to get into specifics here – perhaps I’ll do a tutorial on processing another time – but I will talk briefly on the subject and share my personal preferences on processing.

Before we had digital cameras, photos were processed in the dark room with chemicals and photographic paper. Now in the digital age, that processing is done on the computer. It’s certainly not exactly the same kind of processing, but you can use old darkroom processing techniques like dodging and burning in the computer. Software like Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture can also give you a lot more freedom with your processing techniques, especially when you are using the raw image format.

This is great for astrophotography, as it can give you a lot of control over your image. But it can also be a double edged sword, and personally I find some of the processing of wide field astro images out there a little over the top. I like to keep my astro images as natural as possible, and process them according to my interpretation of how I saw the scene on the night. This includes making sure my white balance is relatively neutral, and not pushing the clarity too much, leaving halos on every edge, or crushing the blacks so much that there is no image information left in them. To the untrained eye, you might never see that there is an issue, but it is important when producing good quality astro photos that you keep your processing in check.

All of this boils down to good in camera techniques, so really all there should be to do when you come to process your astro photos is to get your white balance in order, correct the exposure if need be, set your white point, add some contrast and control your noise with noise reduction. Much beyond this, and you may find your image begins to fall apart with processing artifacts.

In the end, processing is very personal and the style of your processed image will vary from one person to another. I’m just giving you my personal view, and some of the things you should look out for.

Before and after processing. The image above is the raw image straight out of camera with no processing at all. The image below has been processed in Lightroom. I try to my processing as natural as possible without going too over the top.

And as a final word, we can’t get amazing night sky images when it is affected by light pollution, so as my contribution to International Dark Sky Week, I thought one of the best ways to educate people about light pollution would be to show them the difference between a light polluted city sky and a dark sky with little or no light pollution. I used time-lapse photography to demonstrate this, and spent many hours in different lighting conditions capturing the footage. Enjoy the video and feel free to spread the word!

City Lights To Dark Skies – International Dark Sky Week 2014 from Mark Gee on Vimeo.


The Art of Night from Mark Gee on Vimeo.

Be Sociable, Share!

36 Responses to “The Art of Astrophotography”

  1. […] The Art of Astrophotography – The Art of Night – The Photography of Mark Gee. […]

  2. André Ignoul says:

    Hi Mark,

    as a follower and supporter of your amazing photography, i must say that your info here is very interesting and worth saving. I thought it would be a PDF so i could download it and safe, but i will save the website link in my favorites here in google chrome.

    Also i’m going to share your blog link in facebook, i have some friends in my home country Belgium, who also are very much interested in photography in general, landscapes, flowers, things like that. But maybe, with the interesting info that you give here, they will give astro photography a try too.

    I’m not in photography at the moment, lost my simple digital camera here in the Philippines and don’t have the money available yet to buy a new equipment. Maybe next year, if i can save some money from my pension,(start receiving that this coming december) to buy a new camera (altho a telescope to watch stars and planets is also a dream since my childhood, looool).

    Thanks for always make your beautiful pictures and your info available for everyone. Wishing you all the best with your amazing hobby and i’m looking forward to see more great shots from you.

    Warm regards from Liloan, Cebu, Philippines

    André Ignoul.

    By the way, i don’t know if u have any notice if there are maps existing of the stars, here at the equator. I live 10° north of it.

  3. Great article Mark. I know this will bring a lot more smiles and satisfaction to anyone who’s wanting to give this genre a crack. I’ve just started and I love it.

    Thank you for sharing this information.

  4. Chris Crawford says:

    Hi Mark – thank you for sharing your advice that is most appreciated when trying to understand the technical challenges of night photography – Ngawi / South Coast is my favourite area. Your photos really display the beauty of what is on our doorstep. Thanking you – Chris Crawford

  5. Robert Mora says:

    Very interesting in-depth article, Photographing the night sky is truly fascinating! Thank you for your tech comments and inspiration of the subject, I’m going to go out and take some for myself. I’ll have to keep an eye on this site! Cheers R ;)

  6. Paul Mitchell says:

    Hi Mark, thanks for the information, its going to help alot! I do have a question on shooting with the 3200 ISO. The highest I have used is 800 and to me it looks so grainy it’s unusable so I try and shoot 400 ISO at the most with long exposures, most with a lot of amp glow in them which I’m trying to learn to avoid. How do you shoot such clean images at ISO 3200 that are so crisp and amazing? Thanks Mark, Paul Mitchell.

    • markg says:

      Hi Paul, yes unfortunately not all cameras are capable of shooting high ISOs of 3200 and above without suffering from a lot of noise.

      I shoot with a Canon 5d mkIII and 6D and they perform really well with high ISOs. I definitely still get noise, but it’s controllable noise which can be suppressed through noise reduction in post – I use the noise reduction in Lightroom for this.

      You can certainly work around the limitations of your camera. Have you tried noise reduction in post on the ISO 800 images you shoot? You may be surprised with the result you get from that, and could then possibly push your ISO higher knowing this. Another method you could use is stacking and averaging images in photoshop. It’s similar to the techniques used in deep space photography. It’s a great way of controlling noise with high ISO images. You can find a great tutorial on that here: And if you want to watch more tutorials on the subject including the way they stack deep space images, just search for: image stacking astrophotography on You Tube.

  7. Apreche says:

    I live in NYC, light pollution makes it pretty much impossible to see anything in the sky. You’re lucky if you can see Venus. One day there will be a power outage, and I’ll have my camera ready.

    • markg says:

      Now that would be a pretty amazing photograph! I’ve always wanted to visit NYC, but that certainly wouldn’t be for the astrophotography :)

  8. […] heart, that patience will ultimately pay off. To help out on getting started with astrophotography, Mark Gee wrote a tutorial that goes over almost everything we need to […]

  9. Doug Ingram says:

    Hi Mark. As if you haven’t already contributed enough to the photography/astrophotography community, you’ve now produced this guide for us all. Thanks so much!

    I’ve read this tutorial and also the PhotoPills one a number of times now and have used hints & tips from you before, too. I also use TPE and StarWalk on my various devices and have used them (in combination and on their own) to set up moonrise and sunrise shots.

    My question now, though is, how do you use these tools to predict where the Milky Way will rise? I want to position the Milky Way’s centre in Sagittarius to be rising behind an island off the coast of New South Wales this weekend, but can’t work out how to line it up like I can do for the moon and sun on a map.

    Again, thanks for your inspiration and tutorials. Most of all, thanks for publishing such wonderful images for all of the world to see, if we so choose.

    • markg says:

      Hi Doug, thanks and glad you have found this useful!

      Where the Milky Way will rise certainly changes throughout the year. The best bet is to use Starwalk and check what direction and time does the centre of the Milky Way rise. The area you are looking for is the Sagittarius area of the Milky Way, which can be seen as the brightest whitish area in Starwalk.

      Currently it rises to the east around 9pm (in the southern hemisphere) so for shooting anything off the NSW coast, now is the perfect time of year to do it. The way to line it up would be to plan on google maps by finding the direction it rises in starwalk, and when on location, you can use Starwalk’s augmented stargazing function to see where it is from your position. If it is dark enough where you are, then you should be able to see the galactic core as a faint glow with the naked eye.

      Luckily the Milky Way doesn’t move as fast as a sun or moonrise, so you will have time to line it up when on location. Of course the best way to see if you have it lined up with the island, is to take a test shot. If not lined up, just move your position until it is.

      Hope this helps!

  10. […] si possono fare è: ma come fanno? E in questo ci aiuta fortemente Mark Gee che qualche tempo fa ha postato un tutorial sulle impostazioni da eseguire per gli scatti notturni, e confido che nel leggerla, rimmarrete sbalorditi da quanto è relativamente facile (in […]

  11. Kevin Gray says:

    Hi Mark, some great tips and really like what you’ve done. I have a question for you that I didn’t seem to find in your tutorial – what do you do for fogging issues if anything? I’m having issues since I live in an area with pretty high humidity and when the camera’s been running for a while, it heats up pretty well. Thanks for your time!

    • markg says:

      Ahhh yes – I have the same issue and perhaps should add that to the blog at some point. Some people velco hand warmers to their lens to keep it warm. I’ve had limited success with that as after 40 minutes or so the handwarmers loose their heat. I now use a heat strap which works perfectly and I can shoot all night without my lens fogging up. There are a few brands around, but I can totally recommend the Dew-not strap:

  12. Renee says:

    What an amazing artist you are Mark. Both Rob Dickinson and Phillip Norman suggested I look at your work when I ask them “how is it you shoot the Milky Way so amazingly”? I can’t thank them enough for first being outstanding artist themselves but above that, to suggest your link so I can witness a wonderous talent such as yours….God Bless and keep on clicking!

    • markg says:

      Thank you Renee – both Rob and Phillip are fantastic photographers! And I’m glad you managed to find me too, and thank you for leaving such a nice comment :)

  13. Loren says:

    What a great article. I have recently purchased my first DSLR and I’ve always been into the sky – from a little kid staring at the stars to eagerly awaiting the next lightning storm. My dream is to one day get some aurorae shots. I agonised over my camera purchase, torn between price (I was on a tight budget) and what I wanted to be able to do with the camera. I settled on a Canon 600D with a twin lens kit. I’m hoping that this will be enough to get me started on it (although I think I might need to make another lens purchase sometime soon to get a bit more flexibility) and then later on look at upgrading. Reading your blog and Facebook page has given me the tips I needed to get started. Now for a cloudless night…..

    • markg says:

      Good on you Loren – your new Canon 600D will definitely get you started. You won’t be able to shoot at some of the higher ISO settings I suggest, but with a lower ISO, you will still get a result that you will hopefully be happy with!

  14. […] moderate aurora.  I’d only recently come across a rather useful guide to astrophotography by Mark Gee, so I decided to compromise between the settings I’d been using for shooting the Milky Way […]

  15. Peter Metham says:

    Your astro photography is outstanding. Thank you so much for sharing it with us.

    I just wanted to make a point regarding digital ISO’s. Your article says,

    “ISO – modern DSLR cameras are capable of high ISOs, which is great for astrophotography, as by setting a high ISO your camera is able to pick up more detail than the naked eye can see. An ISO in digital photography measures the sensitivity of your image sensor in your camera. The higher the ISO value, the more sensitive or amplified your image sensor is to light.”

    A similar statement may be found at: and,

    A well informed source and very interesting article has this to say,

    “An image sensor has an innate sensitivity to light (called its native sensitivity); higher ISOs are produced by increasing the gain or other manipulations to amplify the underexposed image, and these manipulations generally reduce image quality—they increase image noise, decrease dynamic range and adversely affect color performance.”


    The fact is that the sensitivity of the sensor is governed by the rules of quantum physics and it is not possible to alter that sensitivity through any setting on the camera.

    • markg says:

      Yes you are correct Peter – ISO in the digital age is different to the sensitivity of ISO in film. And is simply an amplification hence the noise at high ISO’s. But it seems the technology is getting better these days, and we are able to shoot at higher ISOs with a little less noise, which is great for astrophotography.

  16. Clive Weston says:

    Mark, this is a great read full of great tips.
    I will be taking notes for the trip to Egypt!!

  17. Jesse Spencer says:

    Hey Mark, your work is simply stunning.

    I’m starting to get into astrophotography myself, and am wondering if you ever use a lens filter? (such as the B+W 77mm 3.0 ND 110 Filter) and if so, do you have a recommendation?

    Right now I have a 5D Mark III (and just a 50mm f/1.4) but I’ll need a wide angle lens too. I noticed you recommend the Rokinon 14mm Ultra Wide-Angle f/2.8 (it is about $2k cheaper than Canon’s :) What do you think?

    Thanks so much!

    • markg says:

      Fantastic Jesse – I’m sure you’ll enjoy the astrophotography journey! No filters required or wanted. You need as much light to get through to your sensor as possible. There are filters which help filter out the light from light pollution, but I shoot in mostly dark locations anyway, so don’t use them.

      I do use a 50mm on occasions for astrophotography – it’s awesome for giving scale to the Milky Way. But yes a 14mm is my most used lens, and you can’t go wrong with the Rokinon 14mm Ultra Wide-Angle f/2.8 for the price of it. It’s manual focus etc but you don’t need that anyway when shooting the night sky.

  18. Rod says:

    Terrific stuff. I’ve done a bit of hunting, and this are the best, clearest tips I’ve seen on astro photography. Helped me a lot doing some shots in the Australian desert recently.

    Next step: do you have further recommendations on post processing? Blending images etc.

    Rod Canon 7D 10-24mm F3.5

    • markg says:

      Fantastic – glad it helped you out! Yes post processing I am planning on writing a tutorial when I get some time…won’t be until next year at this stage. I don’t actually blend images, but if you go to YouTube and do a search, I think there are some good tutorials there.

  19. […] last week I found another a new guide to astrophotography. It called The Art of Astrophotography, and it looks incredibly helpful. It is definitely worth a […]

  20. Yogesh says:

    Hi Mark,

    This is really amazing stuff. Thanks for putting this for Astrophotography lovers !!
    Very much appreciated.
    I have started doing astro-photography few months back (after attending lot of Star parties, of course, because I felt I should be able to read the sky first..& that too without Stellarium ;)… and I’ve done bit a progress in it…anyway).
    I have few questions to ask.
    Before asking queries, let me state that currently I am much into photographying constellations and will move to deep sky objects gradually.
    I use 18-55 kit lens for capturing constellations.

    Secondly, I can’t invest in telescopes or tracking devices. Quite costly !!
    (May be i will have to prepare that poor & quite useful thing… yes, the barn door tracker :) )
    and I stay in that part of city where there is minimum light pollution.
    1) I have 100mm f/2 canon lens which I found very effective for capturing M41 open cluster. I had to crop the photo later..which is ok.But I want to ask whether I should go for 50mm f/1.8? What advantage will it have for capturing M41 like objects? Just the ‘f’ number..I mean will it gather more details than 100mm without loosing sharpness/focus etc?
    2) I do have zoom lens 55-250mm but i am doubtful about its performance for astrophotography :| .How can I use this zoom lens and for what purpose?

    It will be great if you suggest me..not just related to above questions or general tips to move to deep sky objects photography with camera/lenses


    • markg says:

      Hi Yogesh – thanks so much! To be honest it sounds you know more about deep space astrophotography than me! My area of expertise is wide field astrophotography, and there are many experts out there that can help you with your questions, but unfortunately I wouldn’t be able to give you the best answers nor tips :( But I know there are a lot of people using just DSLR camera and lenses for deep space astrophotography, and you are right – that usually involves a tracker. I found this tutorial on YouTube about using a DSLR camera without a tracker quite informative – be worth checking out:

Leave a Reply